There is lots of talk about email going
away: some are swearing completely off of email, others complain about how many
messages they receive in their inbox, others use only email. Our own research shows that for many
corporate workers, the importance of email continues to grow. Add to all of this the continuing discussions
about migrating from GroupWise to “Outlook” (the subject of an upcoming blog
post), how Notes/Domino is losing share to Exchange, etc.
However, what does it really
matter? The fundamental goal of email
when it was invented decades ago was to enable people to communicate in a more
efficient way. That goal has never
changed, but the tools that are available to corporate decision makers to
enable that efficiency have. For
example, we now have social tools that can enable communication in a way that
enables easier access to and analysis of employee and customer sentiment. We have collaboration tools that make it
easier for groups to work on a document instead of sending a file to everyone
via email. We have text messaging and
instant messaging that enable bursty types of communication that are more
efficient than email.
Spending time at Lotusphere last week
reinforced my view that IBM, more than many other vendors, really understands
the new paradigm. To them it’s not so
much about Notes/Domino losing share to Exchange (which, on a worldwide basis,
is questionable anyway given that there are more Domino servers under
management than at any time in the company’s history) or cloud vs. on-premise
or social media vs. email. Instead, it’s
about how communications is evolving into a new platform that integrates social
into the business fabric – integrating new paradigms with the old where it
makes sense to do so. It’s about a shift
in corporate culture that doesn’t focus on siloes of information, but instead
uses a variety of communication modes in a way that makes the most sense. For example, email need not – and should not
– succumb to social media, but instead evolve into a tool that enables
integration of various communication types that makes sense given a particular
organization’s culture, regulatory environment, today’s customer base, future
customer base, the geographic distribution of its employees and other factors.
The bottom line is that email – and
every other mode of electronic communication – is about how to let employees
and customers communicate, collaborate, learn, change and act in a way that
makes sense. Those who get caught up in the
email vs. social media vs. Web 2.0 vs. cloud vs. on-premise vs. whatever else
discussion are often missing the bigger picture: this is much more about business and efficiency,
not so much about technology.
OR
Commentary for Messaging Wire
Week of January 23, 2012